District 69 Contest Results

Your Thoughts?

Were you at the Convention and saw the contests? We’d love to hear your feedback on the quality of the contests, and most controversially, do you agree with the judges decisions? Who stood out to you? What tips did you pick up from the speakers?

International Speech Contest

1st: Pushpa Vida

2nd: Alison Cleaver

3rd: Jock Elliot

Evaluation Speech Contest

1st: Lorraine Lehmann

2nd: Kate George

3rd: Donna Kildea

Humourous Speech Contest

1st: Terry Hicks

2nd: Kayt Duncan

3rd: Robyn Maciejewski

Table Topics Contest

1st: Kayt Duncan

2nd: Pushpa Vida

3rd: Philip Clynes

http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_48.png http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.toastmastersd69.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

5 Responses to “District 69 Contest Results”

  1. Christine Lennon says:

    Evaluation is one of my passions so I was interested in the Evaluation Contest. I believe that in other Districts the presenters don’t use their notes when they come out on stage. If this is the case what are our Clubs in the Divisions doing and is this taken into consideration with the judging?

  2. I agree with you, Christine. Points should be taken off if presenters use notes on stage.

  3. Leonard Scuderi says:

    If you look at the judging form 40% of your marks are to do with your Analysis, 30% for Recommendations and 15% is to do with your summary. With 85% of your score based on what you say the focus should be on who has been the most helpfull to the speaker rather than the qualitity of the presentation. A factor of wether the presenter did or didn’t use notes should not come into it.

  4. Nicky says:

    I would say the points for presentation notes would be allocated under technique. A no notes presentation would likely connect better with the audience, and therefore the test speaker, and is likely to therefore be more sympathetic, sincere and enthusiastic.

    Of course this would depend on the presenter, but just like a speech generally connects better without notes, so too does an evaluation.

  5. terry stormon says:

    I disagree strongly & feel that the five minute preparation is for exactly that, structuring exactly what the speaker said & what they need to hear, & it is too important to freewheel it. It even looks better, is the more professional approach, it is why the lectern is there, but absolutely defer to the opposite when it is the International speech contest.

Leave a Reply